0
2012-07-09 • 2810 megtekintés • 7 replies
Who do you think was a better player Matt Anderson or Bartosz Kurek?
Andrut 215 8
11 évvel ezelőtt
+5
todor aleksiev
NXT 241 3
11 évvel ezelőtt
+3
Well Bratoyev was very close though ?
rbk17 143 2
11 évvel ezelőtt
+2
We won because we were the best! Now we know how good is Mathew Anderson with good opposite team - he is average.
Leland22 14 1
11 évvel ezelőtt
+2
Matthew Anderson is certainly not average. He is not as good as Kurek or Mikhailov but he is still one of the best players in the world. It is not his fault that Lambourne couldn't make a pass to save his life. He was hitting against a well formed double or triple block every play, he did as well as anyone could have.
raylight 3006 15
11 évvel ezelőtt
0
Todor Aleksiev is the best scorer and receiver based on stats and these stats don't lie, not like Bratoev case. About these players I think both are in the star category

P.S. First three opinions are very arrogant, calm down, kids.

Wilfredo, the heading has nothing to do with the question, this is trolling
RenanZ 1538 15
11 évvel ezelőtt
0

Wilfredo, the heading has nothing to do with the question, this is trolling



Surprised Raylight? Aeheahehea
Leland22 14 1
11 évvel ezelőtt
0
Yes tommy, Anderson is playing in Russia too, for Zenit Kazan! It's silly to criticize him for one game, which wasn't even his fault. Americans always take longer to develop because they don't get as much training time when they're younger and then they go waste away in the college game where they aren't pushed to get better. After a year at Kazan in the Russian league and then the Champions League he will be top 10 in the world.
Röplabda játékosok rangsoraKi a valaha volt legjobb röplabdázó?Játékosok rangsorának mutatásaRöplabda játékosok rangsora
Ki a valaha volt legjobb röplabdázó?Játékosok rangsorának mutatása
0