Podaci korisnika
Komentari
Zenit Kazan - Fakel Novy Urengoy (Highlights)
0
@phil: Thank you! :-) Forgot that USA played NORCECA ;-)
please, does anybody know, why is Matt Anderson not playing? Thanks in advance
please just would like to ask about "foreign players rules" in Italy: heard that only 3 foreigners might be playing in new season-is it right? :-) THANKS in advance
the big smile behind my sentence should sign that it was just JOKE ;-)
same playing style like Kurek.... :-P
MVP- libero LOL :-)
too many big changes in one year rof SKRA...they should not lose Falasca so quickly...better to keep him and import slowly the second setter
he is very good....but for me he plays very good from quick sets but he has many times problems from high sets against prepared defence(for example: Sokolov plays althougt quite qucik+is good and strong from high sets...)
has USA NT some good young setter?
when someone like marshall in good shape serves I will also be hapier to receive in 4 than "just" in 3 ;-)
good choose...(I am also pleased that you have chosen Stokr:-P)
Grozer has to show his quality for longer time not just in one epic season
not good transfer for Marlon....
all Czech servers and volleycountry.com too are still speaking about FAMOUS Grozer but i haven t seen Akhrem made any mistake(without serve mistakes) in whole final matches....AMAZING team
famous Russian block and Verbov :-P
Sokolov played a great match!
for me he is too slow and he makes a lot of mistakes- his play is not so fluently as the others brazilian setters
Marcelinho the worst setter in Brazilian NT ever :-( shame
how does Tichacek play this season?-
I am looking at the results but it does not say me anything about his play
totally agree :-)
and I hope that he will play so much as he has a good shape...
and please, just t oStoychen- it looks like that he makes still a preasure on players(at most on Bary but he never says anything to MAtey)- is it just my point of view?
all Czech fans and players love Stokr- for us he is the SUPERSTAR
I can not be objectiv in this case but I think that Stoychev makes a lot of presure on Stokr and sometimes without reasons subtitutes him for Sokolov, does not he?
it is not fair
he should not do that!